Wireless Mobile Phone Global Network: An In-depth View
By Mark McCarron (MarkMcCarron_ITT@hotmail.com)
Introduction
Well here it is the in-depth analysis of the new Wireless Mobile Phone Global
network. In this article we will compare and analyze the competing wireless
technologies available. Also included is the background to this systems
development, a basic how-to guide to build the infrastructure, IP mobility, the
finances behind it, the OS, services, handset features, connectivity, storage
Devices, and security (including preventing packet fraud). As a bonus, I have
also included the legal framework behind the system. Finally, in a section
entitled 'The Ultimate Legal Precedent in US History', I clearly explain why the
US telecommunications industry is unconstitutional and cite, no less than, 16
breaches of The First Amendment to the US Constitution.
Wireless technologies
There are several different types of wireless technology. We will discuss the
two main contenders for this system the 54Mbit line-of-sight and the 3 GPP UMTS
16Mbit non-line of sight systems. We will begin with the 54Mbit line-of-sight,
we will not go too in-depth into this as most will be familiar with the system.
Access points are used to create a central point of contact for all wireless
connections within a given distance. Now in practical use a load of 30
connections per access point is the maximum for basic network services such as
printing, file sharing and Internet browsing. When you need to stream
multi-media, live video in our case, then the maximum connections to a single
access point is around 10. Access Points automatically perform load balancing
when configured on the same network. So, the more access points, the better
throughput end users will receive and lower latency times on their connections.
Access points can also be used to increase the network coverage. Now these
limitations on connection load are affected by the type of router system
involved as well as the reception capabilities. The router that will be used
behind this project is an intelligent and self-organising system. Due to this,
the packet management system streams are dealt with more effectively. Combined
this with the layered protocol of FAST TCP, which can boost transmission by up
to 6000%, then the implementation of this system will outstrip the rated
capabilities.
Line-of-Sight communication is difficult to implement in an urban environment as
the considerations are extensive. Careful planning and testing must be done at
access point locations. This ensures a smooth installation, minimal packet loss,
widest possible coverage, and good cross-communication with other access points
for load balancing. Now I have seen a number of access points that have been
modified to include a pre-amp. A pre-amp, also known as heat, boosts the signal
and its range. This practice is illegal in most countries as it causes
interference with other radio frequencies. A better solution is to boost the
gain on the receiver only and use a high quality filter to remove the background
noise. By boosting the gain on the receiver, very weak signals can be captured.
In a wireless network where all receivers have their gain boosted, the net
effect is almost as good as using a pre-amp and there is none of the associated
cross interference. There are limits to how far the gain can be boosted on the
receiver and is determined by the quality of the setup. The only thing that must
be considered is that the 802.11a compliant equipment operates with only 4
different channels (8 with UNII1 and UNII2 combined and 12 in North America) and
this could present a problem with close proximity of access points. Also,
adjacent cells can have issues with adjacent channels due to sidebands.
Therefore, complete backwards compatibility across the standard may in some
cases have to be eliminated. Since certain major mobile phone operators only
support certain bands, this appears not to be much of concern to them and, thus,
it should not be a major concern for this project.
Another concern, at least in Europe, was the strict licensing of the 5GHz
frequency. The UK just recently (12th Feb. 2003) deregulated this and this
appears to be the case throughout Europe now, however, there maybe some regions
(such as Spain) that will not allow it. The problem here with regulation is that
radar and satellite belonging to NATO operated in that spectrum. To combat this,
a system known as Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) was introduced that 'sensed'
when these broadcasts were happening. Another feature added was Transmit Power
Control (TPC) that controls the signal strength depending on how close it to an
access point. The solution maybe to abandon the 802.11a 5GHz frequency and move
the system to the 802.11g 2.4GHz frequency. The 802.11g standard is also
compatible with 11Mbit 802.11b standard and has no regulation problems globally.
Airgo has announced a 108MB implementation and it increases the range between 2
to 6 times. As the current technology has a range of around 200m this means that
this new system has an effective range of between 800m to 1.2Km. You can read
about Airgo's new technology here at 'The Register' (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/69/32380.html).
Now Proxim had a 2x system that boosted the signal range and pushed the rate to
108Mbit but this boost was not allowed in Europe. Since Airgo is using a dual
transmitter system (2 54Mbit chipsets), I cannot see how this would break
European regulations as it is essentially the same principle as using two cards
and load balancing between them, unless of course they are using some form of
pre-amp that breaches regulations.
The next technology is from IP wireless, Time-division-duplex (TDD) is used,
according to the 3GPP UMTS UTRA TD-CDMA standard using Release 99 of the
standard. The system supports channelisation of 5 and 10 MHz (6 and 12 MHz in
the MMDS band). The 3GPP standards include 3 alternative air-interface (physical
layer) standards, which all share higher layer protocol stack and core network /
back office architecture. These air-interface standards are FDD W-CDMA, High
Chip Rate TD-CDMA, and low chip rate TD-SCDMA. TDD, includes a true N=1 reuse
meaning that the Operator can deploy a network throughout a city with only 1 5
MHz RF channel for a 3.84 Mcps system and one 10 MHz channel for a 7.68 Mcps
system.
This technology operates in a non line-of-sight environment, however, it does
not have the penetration of the mobile phone network in terms of buildings, etc.
The systems is deployed in cells that can cover up to 29KM. This systems
operates at only 16Mbits in a combined downlink and uplink and is broadcast over
the 2.5GHz spectrum. This type of technology requires licensing and the is a
lengthy process. Also, it requires masts to be erected, however, it does not
require truck rolls or smart antennas.
IP Wireless's technology appears to be slow for the needs of this project. The
cell deployment is just moving in the same direction as the mobile phone
operators. In terms of cost effectiveness, the deployment of the 54MB wireless
system appears to be the simplest option. Also, the legislation requirements for
IP wireless's implementation presents a major hurdle and trying to obtain them
globally would be a nightmare.
The humble beginnings
If you have read this part before in another article, then you can move to the
next section. I was investigating new transport technologies in Finland with a
few friends and co-workers on the GIEIS project, about 20 in all. I was
explaining to them the IrishWAN project, simply put, the project is an attempt
to distribute a country-wide wireless Internet access for next to nothing.
Several areas are up and running so far on pilot programs to iron out any mass
deployment bugs. Each region is independent from each other, however, this is
just for the test phase and will progress to a unified approach. We can
currently deliver 11MB access to each user, as the network expands a fee of
between £5 and £10 per month will most likely be introduced to fund the system
and it will move to 54MB.
An idea came to us about using the system to massively undercut the
telecommunications industry and resolving the 'last mile' issue. We had at our
disposal 5 Nokia 3310's, 10 54MB wireless cards, 5 PCI and 5 PCMCIA. We quickly
networked 5 machines and stuck a 54MB card in each and connected them over a
100MB ethernet network. This would simulate the backbone and router structure.
Next we had to bypass the transmission circuits on the Nokia 3310 and interface
the packet stream to the COM port on the laptops. We used the laptop and a
modified script to translate the Nokia packet stream into a TCP/IP datagram and
direct it to the 54MB PCMCIA card. The video was supplied by a standard webcam
and the laptops were being used to simulate different phone features. Now the
Nokia 3310 was not designed to display video, nor did it have the circuits to do
it. So we used a second program on the laptop that merged and separated the
video stream from the voice stream. The video stream was output to the laptops
monitor and the voice stream to the Nokia 3310. We had to add a two second
synchronisation slide to the video, so that we could manually synchronize the
voice and video. We did not have the time to write an automatic system and this
was just to demonstrate the principle. We also created a server application that
would allow a conference call between all 5 systems, again we did not have the
time to write components such as a packet loss mechanism. It took 36 hours.
When we tested the system there were some minor problems, however, we corrected
them. We then placed a conference call and synchronised each of the video links.
It was a complete success, there was some minor skipping due to packet loss but
nothing that serious and a bit more software optimisation and better packet
handling would resolve the issue. Also, a protocol like FAST TCP would eliminate
the problem completely. With the pulsed-width modulation disabled, talk time was
around 8 hours. We believe that by removing the pulsed-width transmission system
and replacing it with a 54MB wireless transmission system we could increase
average talk time to around 2 or 3 times the current length.
The technical considerations are pretty straight forward. The first issue was IP
mobility and how this could be achieved, would we use some form of DHCP or
static IP assignments. We concluded that the best method was to adopt the
ethernet approach and hard-wire an IP number to a chip on board and have them
assigned by the Internet authorities. So, the deployment of IPv6 may be short
lived, as we may not have enough IP addressing space. I do not know the extent
of adoption yet on IPv6, if possible we could just scrap it and move to IPv7m (m
for mobile). Also, as this is a layered protocol system we could introduce a
type of FLASH BIOS or EPROM chip that would allow updates to occur. Of course we
would need to introduce some form of hardware lock, to stop virus' from flashing
your mobile BIOS or any other chip.
The next issue with IP mobility is roaming, how does the system know where to
deliver the packet? The current system relies on the fact that nodes are
essentially static and hardwired. This allows ARP to resolve things such as the
underlying ethernet or hardware address. The way to resolve this, again, is
pretty straight forward. Every packet is sent to the host system from which the
IP was allocated. Lets say it is IrishWAN. Each wireless router would know the
location of the central server and inform it that it was in control of your
signal. Now the controlling router would calculate your signal strength and
compare it with the strength from each router within a 3Km radius and then
forward your packets to the closest router to the signal until that router was
confirmed by IrishWAN central server that it was now in control and packets were
sent to it directly. Some form of Dynamic ARP will need to be developed and
deployed at router level.
Bandwidth throttles may have to be put into some places were network demand is
high. Your mobile will tell you how much bandwidth is available and light up
symbols to tell you which services can be used. One-to-One two-way video can
work on less than 1MB bandwidth and unless you need an entire conferencing
service, you will never really notice any effect of low bandwidth availability.
Internet access is provided by combining business, school and university
Internet access country-wide over the intelligent and self-organising routers.
After business hours these connections are wasted and it is also the peak time
for home usage. As this service will be free to business for mobile use and free
global roaming they should have not much objection to hosting a small router and
some cabling.
The WAN Infrastructure and Finances
Right, let's get down to the bones of this system. According to Weismann
Consulting (http://www.weisman-consultants.com/) that a mobile phone tower
(mast) can cost anywhere between $75,000 to $2,000,000. For our purposes we will
assume a basic cost of £75,000 (Sterling) for the cost of erecting a mast. For
triangulation of signals at least three masts are needed and that would cost, at
our assumed rate, £225,000 then add to the that the cost of the back-end
infrastructure. A lot of money, I am sure we all agree on that and that is the
heart of the problem. With the cost of this system, trying to push up the speeds
means more investment and this is simply not profitable. We are going to propose
here a system that is highly profitable and can replace the entire global
telecommunications infrastructure.
Now, let's take IrishWAN as an example here. IrishWAN's most practical approach
to infrastructure costs would be to introduce a fee of around £10 per month, or
about £2.50 per week. This would result in a total annual bill of £120 per user.
Now, let's take an outrageously low figure of only 4,000 subscribers in an
average sized city. This would generate an annual turnover of £480,000. Now, we
will forget about tax here for the moment, also as this is infrastructure is a
legitimate business cost, we can write it off anyway and by spreading it across
a number of years we can maximize that tax benefit.
Now for £280,000 we can purchase 400 routers of the intelligent and
self-organising variety (£700 each). Essentially, with these routers all you do
is plug them in and mount the aerial. That's it, the rest is automatic. Now to
increase coverage, there is a nifty piece of hardware. It acts like a hub, but
it is designed for aerials, 10 aerials (or more) can be attached to it and it
senses which aerial is receiving and switches between them at a high rate
buffering the data and forwarding it to the server. From the servers
point-of-view, it is the same as a single aerial so no additional software or
even drivers are required. This allows access points to be distributed over an
incredibly large area and even inside pubs and nightclubs. These hubs are about
£50 each and would provide over 4,000 access points for 400 routers totaling
£20,000. As most aerials use normal co-ax cabling, at £0.20 per meter this means
that 10Km can be purchased for £2,000. Each aerial can be bought for £5 under
bulk purchasing conditions, a total cost of £20,000 for 4,000. So far, that is a
total amount of £322,000. This can provide effective coverage for 6-8 sqKm.
Now we purchase 20 servers, these do not need to be high-end either, just good
specification desktop PCs will do. Since all the software will be free and
preconfigured (thanks to the Linux community), including security, all you do is
load it in. 20 severs will cost about £20,000 and should include ethernet cards
(100Mbit). Add to that a 2 16 port hubs, some patch leads, and a wireless router
(or more if you need) and that will set you back about £1000. That is a total
cost of £343,000, leaving £137,000.
Now two engineers can install 10 routers a day and that would take 40 days for
complete installations. Give them another 40 days to complete each of the aerial
installations. Add another 20 days to load and test the back-end servers. Then
another 20 days to test the entire infrastructure and load testing. That's a
total of 120 days or about 4 months. A good office space will cost around
£20,000 per year in rent. Hire 1 person (£15,000) to input mobile phone IP
addresses and direct debit details and leave out up to £20,000 for legal,
accountancy and bank fees, etc. This leaves you with £82,000 or if the two
engineers are running the company, a wage packet of £41,000 in your first year
and no company debt. Completely breaking even within 12 months.
There will be other costs such as advertising, stationary, garbage collection
and rates, etc. However, even if all these hidden costs amounted to massive
£21,000. The two engineers would still make £30,000 each in their first year. By
striking deals with manufacturers of paying for hardware over financial years
great tax benefits can be reaped as well. Talk to your accountant.
Remember, this is for only 4,000 people. For a city of 200,000 people an annual
turnover of £24 million is generated, assuming all adopt the system. With free
phone calls, live-video, a £10 a month fee, free broadband access (for PCs as
well as mobiles) that makes BT's broadband look like the postal service, who
wouldn't?
Also, in business terms, this enterprise is literally a goldmine and the
beginning of a new boom in the IT industry.
OS, Services, Handset features, Connectivity and Storage Devices
The OS that will run the system will be Linux. The distribution will be
preconfigured by the best in the industry for rapid deployment to back-end
systems. The distribution will also have features that will allow it to
automatically integrate itself into an expanding network to minimise
administration requirements. As every local back-end runs on the same
principles, images of the distribution can be made ready for downloaded and
loading. Also, being Linux, everyone can see the source code and know exactly
what information is kept on them, eliminating any privacy concerns. In addition,
updates can be spread across the world in minutes and mirrored at every
location, even updates for mobile phones too.
The services provided to the handsets can now be free email, free SMS, free MMS,
free Instant Messaging, free voice-mail, free video-mail, free voice calls, and
free streaming real time video calls. Also, this helps the progression towards
e-Government services such as doctor appointments, dentist appointments, etc.
The system can also be supported by local advertising such as cinemas, theatres,
and nightclubs. Just go to the menu on your phone and select 'What's on
Tonight?', select your continent, select your country, and select your city and
view the list.
One of the major new services will be webTV. Basically, everyone and their dog,
can now open their own web based TV station and stream it over the web. You can
watch your favourite shows on the move, play multiplayer games and a host of
other activites.
These new handsets can really demonstrate the power of modern technology. Not
only will they have the capability to connect to the Internet, but also, to each
other either by using the main network in your country or directly to each
other. No more running about trying to enter someones number, just point the two
IR sensors (wireless would ask everyone in the neighbourhood) at each other and
select number request, all the other person has to do is say yes or no. Its a
great way to get someone's number in a bar, even if you are not talking to them
or strike up a conversation using the instant messenger. Also, the handsets can
act as broadband modems for your PC or laptop. With a click of a button you can
change the profile to suit the network settings of the network you wish to
connect to.
Combine this technology now with Sony's memory stick Pro series of 512MB and we
have a serious piece of hardware. No more burning CD's or using floppy disks to
transfer files. We could even give it a USB interface for computers without a
wireless adapter. Other features of the new handsets is that they can now become
a personal stereo too. Either listen to web radio or your favourite MP3's stored
on the memory stick. With multiple memory sticks, you essentially have a
removable harddrive with unlimited capacity. The handsets will run Linux and
Linux will be the primary supported OS.
The possibilities are only limited by your imagination.
Security
The SSID is a unique identifier that identifies all Access Points and wireless
clients as a member of your wireless network, clients with a different SSID can
not gain access to the network via the Access Points. Globally, all SSID's will
be the same to allow for roaming. Access rights are done at a higher level in
tandem with the protocol stack.
WEP is a security protocol, specified in the IEEE Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi)
802.11b standard using a 40bit data encryption algorithm. WEP should be renamed
the 'Waste-of-Space Encryption Protocol', even other variants of this such as
128bit are not suitable. So, we are going to introduce OpenPGP and use the
Twofish cipher either in software form or on a FLASH BIOS. This will allow
upgrades to be done. When an upgrade is available, your phone will tell you when
you log onto the network and provide the option to download. This will then be
stored on the memory stick and the phone will then ask to install the update.
The OpenPGP hash will be check against the main servers and if everything is
correct, it will then ask you to turn of your phone and disable the hardware
lock. When the phone comes on again, it will not have network connectivity and
the update will install. When finished, the phone will ask you to switch off and
enable the hardware lock. If the hardware lock is disabled, the phone also
disables the network connectivity for security reasons.
Now, authentication of a phone is performed by both the router and your wireless
WAN provider. The IP address of your phone is registered in the database of the
wireless WAN provider against your account details. So to authenticate at a
router, you turn on your phone and your IP address is resolved and it is
forwarded to the login system of your wireless WAN provider. The IP address is
checked against the database and if a match occurs, and the account has an
active status, then this server sends back a login request. You enter your
username and password and submit. This is checked against the database and an
random encrypted code is sent to the router (it enters its database) and the
router forwards it to your phone. It is then immediately filtered to each
router, that this router talks to, and they then do the same. The idea being
that their transmission will be faster than any mode of transport available to
you and by the time you get to the next router, your code will be there.
When you try to use any service, first your encrypted code is transmitted to the
router. If it recognises the code, it then requests the phones IP address. It
then broadcasts the IP address to your wireless LAN provider with a code
request. When that code returns, the two codes are compared and only if they are
the same does the router allow transmission to take place. Now to prevent a
slightly complicated spoofing attack, if a second packet arrives with a
different code, the session is terminated, details recorded and passed to the
local servers attack logs. For this to work, each request would require a unique
randomly reusable serial number.
After you login, every five seconds your IP is broadcast back to the main server
by a pulse and this updates the server with the IP of the router you are closest
to. Since there is no way to resolve the new IP address of the routers to
geographic co-ordinates, no tracking is possible. If the Linux community wishes,
we could have the routers perform a random IP swap with any of its neighbours at
a random time. However, this maybe overkill and may make network troubleshooting
a bit complicated, such as not being able to locate problem routers. In this
case, a dynamic map would need to kept and that provides a tracking method.
The Ultimate Legal Precedent in US History
In releasing a system like this I was well aware that big business would
essentially be able to move in and take control of the system. So, I had to
devise a method of legally protecting the system and, if at all possible, make
its introduction of the system a legal requirement. I went into deep study
looking for legal technicalities that could be exercised to make this possible.
After all, if murders can walk free from jail due to technicalities in law, then
there is no reason that I can not use the same tactics to benefit everyone
globally with free mobile communication. Then I found it, in the most unlikely
place, The First Amendment to the US Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances." — The First Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution
Now you maybe wondering, how does this help. Well, let us first isolate the
portions that are relevant:
"Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech...or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble"
Well the US dictionary, Merriam-Webster (http://www.m-w.com) has the following
definitions listed under the words 'free' and 'Freedom'(The numbers are from the
dictionary definition):
Free:
1 c : enjoying political independence or freedom from outside domination
3. b : not bound, confined, or detained by force
4 a : having no trade restrictions
5 a : having no obligations or commitments
7 a (1) : not obstructed or impeded
8 b : not confined to a particular position or place
10 : not costing or charging anything
11 a (1) : not united with, attached to, combined with, or mixed with something
else 11 c : not permanently attached but able to move about
15 : open to all comers
Freedom:
1. a : the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action
1. h : unrestricted use
I am sure that the majority of you can now see what I am about to do.
I claim that charging for any form of telecommunications, within the US
jurisdiction, whether it be voice or data, through any medium including, but not
limited to, wireless, cabling, or satellite is a violation of The First
Amendment to the US Constitution.
I will apply my reasoning in the context of The First Amendment to the US
Constitution. It must be noted that under US law voice and text are considered
forms of speech and the digital representation (data) is considered a form of
speech also. Information is drawn from data, therefore, data must also be speech
otherwise data could not be turned into information. Where you see '(Freedom
1h)' or something similar this refers to the dictionary definitions listed
above, a 'breach' is something that does not agree with the accepted definition.
"US citizens do not enjoy the 'unrestricted use' (Freedom 1h) and the 'free
exercise' of the 'freedom of speech' over telecommunications as the services are
'confined' (Free 3b) by charges imposed. This 'obligation or commitment' (breach
of Free 5a) to 'pay' (breach of Free 10) is supported by the threat of
'detainment by force' (breach of Free 3b). In addition, it can be also said that
the threat of 'detainment by force' (breach of Free 3b) due to the 'need to pay'
(breach of Free 10) means that US citizens are being 'coerced' (breach of
Freedom 1a) and have 'lost there rights to choice or action' (breach of Freedom
1a) when attempting 'free exercise' of their right to 'freedom of speech' over
telecommunication systems. Telephone, Mobile, and Internet users are being
'restricted' (breach of Freedom 1h), 'obstructed and impeded' (breach of 7 a(1))
in their attempts of 'free exercise' of their right to 'freedom of speech'. The
'free exercise' of both the 'freedom of speech' and 'the right of the people
peaceably to assemble', in relation to video conferencing, is being 'obstructed
and impeded' (breach of Free 7 a(1)) by both the 'restricted usage' (breach of
Freedom 1h) and 'applicable charges' (breach of Free 10) imposed. In relation to
business, they are being obstructed, impeded (breach of Free 7a) and restricted
in their trade (breach of Free 4a) when attempting 'free exercise' of their
right to 'freedom of speech' by 'charges' (breach of Free 10). The 'charges'
(breach of Free 10) are a direct violation of 'free exercise' and 'freedom of
speech'. The metering of calls based upon time used is a direct violation of the
'freedom of speech', as the definition of freedom is unrestricted use. In
clearer terms, imposing charges on telecommunications systems, prohibits the
free exercise of the freedom of speech and the right of the people peaceably to
assemble."
I think that should about cover it. I am sure this will be added to by the
American people and move the telecommunications industry back into the hands of
the people where it belongs. Now, to ensure that no big business can develop nor
control the new system I would like to enact 15 Am Jur 2d: Charities (American
Jurisprudence 2nd Ed. , Volume 15, Topic: Charities). This act, which I have
read in full, essentially states that even with selfish motives a charity can be
established as long as it does charitable work. So, I have worked out a clever
way to use this, to essentially create a 'non-profit, profit making charity in a
round-about way'. The principle goes something like this and is perfectly legal.
We setup a charity that is responsible for 'The Global Expansion of the Free
Exercise of the Freedom of Speech'. A good and charitable cause. This is
respected in International law under The Basic Human Right to Freedom and thus
acceptable globally. This 'charity' will have a large number of members, each
(or a team or board) who (that) is (are) responsible for at maximum 1 Million
people within his/her (their) local area. Each person that wishes to exercise
his/her right to 'unrestricted use' or 'freedom of speech' on this system must
agree to assist the charity in the financial upkeep of the system to the value
of $10 per month in the form of a donation. The members of the charity will not
be in competition with each other, they are partners within the same charity.
You may only be involved in one area. If your local area is unavailable then you
have the right to expand the charity in an area not within your place of
residence.
Now I bet you are wondering how does this 'profit-making in a round-about way'
occur. Well, all sums are sent through the local representatives to the central
charity. The central charity deducts 5% of the total amount received and holds
that in a charitable fund to be distributed annually to good causes globally.
These 'good causes' must have a direct impact on the quality of life, the
expansion/enforcement of basic human rights and those in need. Now the sums left
are distributed back from the central charity as 'running costs' to the
representatives. From this, they are then expected to pay for wages, hardware
investment, and general running costs as dictated by the standards set by the
central charity. The rest of the money left, is their 'wages'. There is no limit
imposed on how much your 'wages' can be. Also, the fund for good causes is
expected to exceed $50 Billion annually.
Globally, all connections to this charity must be a 'overseas branch' of this
charity otherwise peering arrangements will be denied. This is because big
business could attempt to move in outside the US. The money in these cases is
routed in the exact same manner. The idea behind this is that we can spread the
global wealth more evenly whilst maintaining a solid economic infrastructure.
Also, it means that we are not subject to the monopolies commission nor any form
of anti-competitive legislation.
To begin, a website must be put in place to co-ordinate with the handset
developers for standards compatibility, generating initial investment, develop
guidelines and generally all associated issues. Once, this site is up and
running we will pull together the hardware manufacturers and I will introduce
this intelligent self-organising router and its creators.
Now that you all know, I will leave it to you.